To Team or Not to Team: A Foundational Debate for the Future of Family Medicine-Insights from the Family Medicine Leadership Council.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42521614.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3122/jabfm.2026.260014R0.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In some form, team-based care is an essential element of family medicine practice; however, the composition, roles, and definitions of team members vary widely. Team-based care has been promoted as a strategy to address rising clinical complexity, workforce shortages, and clinician burnout in family medicine. This article synthesizes a structured dialogue convened by the Family Medicine Leadership Council (FMLC) that examined both the promise and limitations of team-based primary care. Drawing on evidence, national data, and leadership perspectives, the discussion highlights key design considerations, tensions related to continuity and professional identity, and the importance of context-sensitive implementation. The article argues for team models adapted to the specific circumstances of diverse practice settings that preserve continuity, accountability, and the core values of family medicine.
Medical subject headings
- Leadership
- Family Practice
- Patient Care Team
- Primary Health Care