Decoding Biological Drug Names in Dermatology: The Post-2022 WHO Nomenclature Revision and Its Implications for Clinical Practice.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42532425.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2026.07.093.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The WHO International Nonproprietary Names (INN) system for monoclonal antibodies underwent its most fundamental revision in 2021-2022, retiring the universal -mab suffix and replacing it with four structure-based stems (-tug, -bart, -ment, -mig). Simultaneously, new stems for JAK inhibitors (-citinib), BTK inhibitors (-brutinib), and oral peptide receptor antagonists (-kinra) have entered dermatological practice. These changes are not yet systematically addressed in dermatology education. Dermatologists prescribe the broadest range of biologic drug classes of any specialty, spanning anti-TNF, anti-interleukin, checkpoint inhibitor, JAK/TYK2/BTK inhibitor, and oral peptide antagonist therapies. This review provides a practical, disease-organized framework for decoding biological drug names, with a three-step algorithm, reference tables covering 26 approved agents, and guidance on biosimilar naming across FDA, EMA, and CDSCO systems. The post-2022 structural stems carry direct pharmacokinetic implications, and two currently used agents (sonelokimab and certolizumab pegol) are structurally misclassified under their legacy -mab names. Nomenclature literacy directly affects adverse event attribution, biosimilar substitution decisions, and pipeline evaluation. Understanding this evolving system is a patient safety competency for practicing dermatologists.