Early recovery patterns differ between medially congruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty, with comparable 2-year outcomes: A triple-blinded randomized clinical trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42534647.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jeo2.70861 and PMC identifier 13420843.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Whether medially congruent (MC) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides clinically meaningful advantages over posterior-stabilized (PS) designs remains controversial. In this randomized trial, early recovery profiles and 2-year outcomes were compared between Persona® MC and PS TKA. In this triple-blinded randomized controlled trial, 82 patients undergoing primary TKA for Kellgren-Lawrence Grade IV osteoarthritis were allocated to receive a Persona® MC or PS system. The primary endpoint was Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (KOOS-ADL). Secondary outcomes included range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), satisfaction and complications. Follow-up was 2 years. Group, time and group × time interaction were assessed using repeated-measures models. Both groups improved over time. Significant group × time interactions were observed for ROM, VAS pain, KOOS-ADL and FJS-12, indicating different recovery profiles. MC knees had greater flexion at 2 weeks (95.3° vs. 83.9°, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and flexion contracture at 2 weeks was observed only in the PS group (0/41 vs. 4/41). Conversely, PS patients reported lower pain scores at 2 weeks (4.75 vs. 6.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 6 weeks (1.92 vs. 2.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Later flexion favoured PS, including at 2 years (118.8° vs. 113.9°, <i>p</i> < 0.001). MC patients reported statistically higher KOOS-ADL and FJS-12 scores at 1 and 2 years; however, between-group differences did not exceed established minimum clinically important difference thresholds. Satisfaction was high in both groups and complications were infrequent. Persona® MC and PS TKA showed different recovery profiles rather than clear superiority of either design. MC-TKA was associated with better early flexion and fewer observed early flexion contractures, whereas PS TKA was associated with lower early postoperative pain and greater flexion at later follow-up. MC showed statistically higher KOOS-ADL and FJS-12 scores, but these differences remained below minimum clinically important difference thresholds. Both designs provided substantial 2-year improvement without clinically meaningful between-group differences in patient-reported outcomes. Level I.