Inverse Dynamics Meets Markerless Motion Capture during Standing: Concurrent Validation of Center of Mass and Center of Pressure Estimations.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42542510.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s10439-026-04281-9.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Observational balance assessment is frequently used clinically but remains subjective and limited in accuracy. Although laboratory-based methods provide precise biomechanical measurements, their need for specialized equipment and expertise limits clinical use. This study presents a multi-view, open-source markerless motion capture system (MMCS) using OpenPose to identify body landmarks, enabling objective balance assessment via center-of-mass (COM) and inverse-dynamics-based center-of-pressure (COP) estimation. The proposed MMCS was experimentally validated. Twelve non-disabled individuals performed five balance tasks (quiet standing on hard and soft surfaces with eyes open and closed, and a weight shift task) against marker-based and force plate measurements. This study also investigated the effect of biomechanical modelling (single-, three-, six-, and eight-segment models) on COM and COP estimations. Using MMCS, COM trajectories estimated from markerless data showed very high agreement with the marker-based gold standard across models (Pearson's correlation coefficient: CC > 0.90). The COP estimated via the eight-segment model and inverse dynamics showed the highest agreement with force plate data (CC = 0.95-0.98; root-mean-square error: RMSE = 2.2-8.5 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction. Across all models, the anterior-posterior direction showed higher correlations than the medial-lateral direction, except for the weight shift task. Increasing number of segments, improved CC and RMSE across tasks, confirming the value of multi-segment modelling for COM and COP estimation when using MMCS. These findings demonstrate that our MMCS can achieve agreement consistent with laboratory-based systems for balance assessment. By reducing reliance on specialized laboratories while maintaining biomechanical validity, this framework supports balance evaluation in rehabilitation clinics.