Impact of reconstruction timing on patient-reported and aesthetic outcomes after DIEP flap breast reconstruction with radiotherapy.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42551303.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.07.035.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Autologous breast reconstruction is known to provide higher satisfaction in patients who require radiotherapy, and reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap is among the most commonly used autologous reconstruction techniques. Three timing strategies are available: immediate single-stage reconstruction, immediate two-stage reconstruction with a tissue expander, and delayed single-stage reconstruction. However, direct comparisons of these strategies using patient-reported outcomes and objective aesthetic assessment remain limited. Therefore, evidence to support shared decision-making is needed. This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap between 2017 and 2023. The irradiated cohort comprised patients who received chest wall irradiation and they were divided into immediate single-stage, immediate two-stage, and delayed single-stage reconstruction groups. A non-irradiated cohort was included for comparison of BREAST-Q scores. Complications were analyzed by flap irradiation status. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the BREAST-Q and aesthetic outcomes assessed using the Harris four-point scale at ≥1 year postoperatively. Among the 40 irradiated reconstructions, BREAST-Q scores and aesthetic outcomes did not differ significantly among the three timing groups. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the BREAST-Q scores by reconstruction timing in the non-irradiated cohort (n = 72). Palpable fat necrosis or firmness was significantly more frequent in the flap-irradiated group (p = 0.0044), and revision procedures in the delayed single-stage group (p = 0.0051). Physical Well-Being: Chest scores were significantly lower in the irradiated cohort (p = 0.0002). Each strategy involves distinct trade-offs and timing should be individualized through shared decision-making.