Age-referenced modeling of lumbar disc degeneration and its association with chronic low back pain: an MRI-based cross-sectional study.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42560503.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00586-026-10241-7.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration is commonly found in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) but is also frequently observed in asymptomatic individuals. The lack of age-referenced values complicates the clinical interpretation of degenerative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Using an age-dependent prediction model derived from a non-cLBP reference cohort, we estimated expected disc degeneration and examined whether degeneration exceeding age-expected levels is associated with cLBP status and pain intensity. This cross-sectional analysis included 1,523 participants with complete lumbar Pfirrmann grading and clinical data (1,121 with cLBP; 402 without cLBP). Age-expected degeneration was modeled in the non-cLBP reference cohort using the Pfirrmann sum score from L1/2 to L5/S1. Standardized residuals were used to classify participants as below-expected, age-expected, or above-expected. Associations with cLBP and current pain intensity were assessed using multivariable regression adjusted for sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking history; sensitivity models additionally adjusted for a cumulative score of Modic-classified vertebral bone marrow signal changes. Based on the non-cLBP reference cohort, a quadratic age-referenced reference model was established for the Pfirrmann sum score (L1/2-L5/S1):[Formula: see text] Above-expected lumbar Pfirrmann degeneration was associated with higher odds of cLBP compared with age-expected degeneration (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.50; p < 0.001) and compared with below-expected degeneration (OR = 4.13; 95% CI, 2.57-6.65; p < 0.001). After additional adjustment for the cumulative Modic score, the corresponding ORs were 1.66 (95% CI, 1.21-2.28; p = 0.002) and 3.63 (95% CI, 2.23-5.90; p < 0.001). This study provides an age-referenced framework for contextualizing lumbar Pfirrmann degeneration relative to expected values in individuals without cLBP. Above-age-expected multilevel disc degeneration was independently associated with cLBP status, supporting the clinical relevance of age-adjusted interpretation of conventional lumbar MRI degeneration grading.