Ethical Conflicts and Educational Needs of Rehabilitation Clinicians in a Teaching Hospital in Malaysia.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42563218.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PHM.0000000000003115.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To identify the ethical issues encountered by rehabilitation clinicians in routine clinical practice and explore their needs and preferences for ethics education. A descriptive survey study. This study was conducted in an urban tertiary teaching hospital in a developing multicultural country. A total of 152 rehabilitation clinicians participated in the study, with a response rate of 44%. Not applicable. A total of 306 narratives were derived from the responses, generating 327 codes that were merged into 40 categories that were later collapsed into nine final themes. The most common theme was situations of conflict at 35.8% (n=117), followed by professionalism at 16.5% (n=54), and respect and dignity at 16% (n=52). Clinical topics were prioritized over administrative topics for ethics education. An interactive, interdisciplinary format of ethics education was preferred over self-learning modalities. Various broad ethical conflicts were identified among rehabilitation clinicians, and an ethics education program tailored to clinicians' preferences is warranted to amicably address the issues identified.