Lower-limb electromyographic responses across four recumbent cycling configurations in healthy young men.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42580165.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113515.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recumbent cycling provides an adjustable configuration in which backrest angle and crank-axis height can alter lower-limb loading. Backrest angle changes the orientation of the active musculature relative to gravity, whereas crank-axis height modifies the foot-pedal interface and the ankle lever arm. Whether such positioning is associated with differences in lower-limb electromyographic (EMG) activation across both factors together has not been examined. Using a randomized crossover design, fifty-nine healthy young men cycled at 100 W and 50 rpm under four conditions combining two backrest angles (30°, 75°) and two crank-axis heights (Rh, high, 77 cm; Rl, low, 45 cm). Surface EMG from the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), and gastrocnemius medialis (GAS) was analyzed for root mean square (RMS) amplitude, absolute onset sequence, and relative recruitment timing (%Sequence, derived using Telescan software and referenced to RF). RMS amplitude did not differ across conditions for any muscle (all p ≥ 0.356), and absolute onset sequence showed no condition effect (all p ≥ 0.197). For GAS %Sequence, the Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected omnibus test was significant (F(1.32, 76.56) = 28.45, p < 0.001), driven by a within-30° contrast in which %Sequence was lower under Rl than Rh (paired t(58) = 10.39, Holm-adjusted p < 0.0001; mean difference 22.0 percentage points, 95 % CI [17.8, 26.3]; dz = 1.35). Because %Sequence is referenced to RF, this exploratory shift should be interpreted cautiously. Lower-limb activation may be constrained by the closed-chain nature of pedaling, whereas distal recruitment timing may be sensitive to crank-axis height and the foot-pedal interface.