The penetrating injury risk of non-home discharge (PIRD) score: Development and validation of a predictive tool using the National Trauma Data Bank.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42585796.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113594.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Penetrating trauma disproportionately affects young patients, yet many survivors cannot be discharged directly home and instead require post-acute care. Identifying these patients early could expedite rehabilitation referral and discharge planning, but no validated tool predicts non-home discharge in penetrating trauma. We developed and internally validated the Penetrating Injury Risk of Non-home Discharge (PIRD) score. Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files (2019-2024), we selected adult patients (≥18 years) with penetrating trauma who survived to discharge. The outcome was non-home discharge to post-acute care (e.g., skilled nursing or inpatient rehabilitation) versus home. The cohort was split 2:1 into derivation and validation sets, stratified by outcome. Candidate predictors available early in the hospital course (demographics, insurance, mechanism, emergency-department physiology, the Injury Severity Score [ISS], body-region injury, transport, and comorbidities) underwent univariate screening, collinearity assessment, and backward-stepwise multivariable logistic regression. Unlike the orthopedic FORD score, ISS was retained because penetrating trauma is a high-severity, mortality-driven population. Coefficients were converted to integer points, scaled 0-10. Among 302,399 patients, 21,186 (7.0%) had non-home discharge. The 40-predictor model was led by spinal-cord injury, critical injury severity (ISS ≥25), advanced age, and severe traumatic brain injury, whereas stab mechanism and private-vehicle arrival lowered the odds. Validation discrimination was strong (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.866, 95% confidence interval 0.861-0.871) with excellent calibration (Brier 0.046, calibration slope 1.00), exceeding the GTOS-II, TRIAGES, FORD, and DEPARTS scores (all p < 0.001). Non-home discharge rose from 0.7% (low risk) to 37.5% (high risk); at a score ≥4, sensitivity was 86.0% and negative predictive value 98.5%. Derived from variables available early in care, the PIRD score accurately predicts post-acute care discharge in adult penetrating trauma and outperforms existing severity scores, supporting timely discharge planning and resource allocation.