E-cigarette product characteristics and packaging features and interest in e-cigarette use: Results from a randomized within-person trial nested in three prospective cohorts.

Abstract

Product characteristics and packaging may be key targets for regulation to reduce e-cigarette use among youth, but existing data are limited. Data are from an experimental study (2018-2020) nested within three prospective cohorts (age 14-26) in southern California (N = 3565). Participants were shown five e-cigarette (e-liquid) packages in a random order that varied in flavor (sweet vs. tobacco), flavor name (descriptive ["blueberry cheesecake"] vs. concept ["smurf cake"] vs. none [number only]), and cartoon image on package (yes/no). For each stimuli, survey items assessed the following outcomes: product appeal (self-enjoyment, others' enjoyment; Likert scale [1-5]), susceptibility to use (use if friends offered, curiosity; 4 ordered responses [definitely not-definitely yes]), peer acceptability (definitely not-definitely yes), and perceived harm (definitely not-definitely yes). Mixed effects proportional odds models evaluated within-person effects of each factor (flavor, flavor name, cartoon) with each outcome. Participants reported greater appeal, susceptibility, and peer acceptability (OR range=3.7-16.9; ps<0.05), and lower perceived harm (OR=0.61; 95%CI=0.53, 0.70) for sweet (vs. tobacco-flavored) e-cigarettes; effects were progressively stronger for younger cohorts. The descriptive flavor name rated higher than the concept flavor (OR range=1.13-2.02; ps<0.05) or number only (OR range=1.18-1.69; ps<0.05) for appeal and susceptibility measures; no differences for concept vs. number were found. The cartoon image rated higher for appeal, curiosity, and peer acceptability (OR range=1.24-1.51; ps<0.05). Sweet flavors, descriptive flavor names, and cartoon images may increase the appeal of e-cigarettes among youth and young adults with no history of e-cigarette use, and are key targets for regulation.