A deep learning model for opportunistic screening of chronic kidney disease using chest radiographs: a multicentre validation study in the USA.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42592112.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104078 and PMC identifier 13463794.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 843 million people worldwide yet remains underdiagnosed. Current risk stratification, including the CKD Prognosis Consortium (CKD-PC) score, relies on laboratory data rarely evaluated outside nephrology settings. Chest radiographs (CXR) are among the most frequently performed imaging procedures globally, offering an opportunistic screening pathway. CXR-CKD5, a CXR-derived AI score for predicting 5-year incident CKD without laboratory data, was developed and externally validated. In this retrospective two-centre study conducted at two sites in the USA, 97,553 adults (≥18 years) without baseline CKD who underwent routine CXR were included: Emory University (development cohort, 2008-2021, n = 75,683) and University of Illinois Chicago (external validation cohort, 2010-2020, n = 21,870). Patients with a CKD diagnosis within 90 days of the index CXR were excluded. A convolutional neural network extracted 10 cardiopulmonary and metabolic risk features from routine CXRs, which were used to train an XGBoost accelerated failure time model. The primary outcome was 5-year incident CKD. Discrimination (C-index) and calibration were evaluated against a clinical base model and the CKD-PC score. CXR-CKD5 achieved apparent C-indices of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.768-0.780) in development (optimism-corrected: 0.737) and 0.713 (95% CI: 0.697-0.729) at external validation. A combined imaging-clinical model achieved the highest external validation discrimination (C-index 0.734, 95% CI: 0.719-0.751). Performance was strongest in non-diabetic patients (development C-index 0.783, 95% CI: 0.775-0.790; external validation 0.714, 95% CI: 0.689-0.739) and attenuated in diabetic patients across both cohorts (development C-index 0.658, 95% CI: 0.645-0.671; external validation 0.607, 95% CI: 0.580-0.634). Absolute risk was overestimated at external validation, indicating that calibration would be required before deployment at new institutions. A threshold of ≥15% predicted risk identified the top 20% at risk. CXR-CKD5 demonstrates that routine chest radiographs can identify patients at elevated CKD risk without laboratory data, offering a scalable opportunistic screening pathway. Recalibration and prospective evaluation assessing clinical outcomes and workflow integration are needed before deployment. NHLBI and the University of Illinois Chicago AI.Health4All Initiative.