Validity and Reliability of Wearable Heat Stress Monitors in Firefighters During Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42613781.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000004113.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the validity and reliability of commercially available wearable heat stress monitors (HSM) for estimating core body temperature (Tc) in firefighters during exercise-induced hyperthermia and recovery while wearing firefighting personal protective equipment (PPE). Twenty-one firefighters completed two identical laboratory trials consisting of treadmill exercise in PPE followed by seated recovery. Tc was measured continuously using rectal thermometry (Trec) (criterion), a gastrointestinal telemetric pill alongside four wearable HSM (Equivital, Kenzen, Zephyr, CORE (arm and chest placement)). Validity was assessed using mean bias, 95 % limits of agreement (LoA), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson's r, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and the proportion of readings within ± 0.3 °C of Trec. Temperature-dependent error was examined across 0.5 °C Trec increments. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (2,1), test-retest bias, and LoA. All HSM demonstrated poor agreement (CCC = 0.26-0.85) along with wide LoA (1.25-2.22 °C) across all phases. During exercise, Equivital showed the strongest overall performance. During recovery, accuracy deteriorated markedly for all devices, with MAE and RMSE approximately doubling and fewer than one-third of readings fell within ± 0.3 °C of Trec. Temperature-dependent analyses revealed progressive increases in RMSE above ~38.5 °C, peaking during early recovery. When exercise and recovery were combined, Equivital and the CORE devices demonstrated the most favourable performance. Overall reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.74-0.81), with lower reproducibility for the arm-mounted devices (Kenzen and CORE-arm). Wearable HSM can track general trends in Tc but lack the accuracy and precision required for critical safety or return-to-work decision-making in firefighters, particularly at higher Tc and during recovery.