FLASH Proton Radiotherapy Preserves Ocular Structure and Function Without Compromising Antitumor Efficacy.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42648580.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.08.045.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the protective effects and therapeutic efficacy of FLASH proton therapy (FR) compared with standard dose-rate proton therapy (SR) in a preclinical model of ocular irradiation. Mice received bilateral ocular irradiation with SR (≤1 Gy/s) or FR (>40 Gy/s) at identical doses. Longitudinal ocular structure and function were assessed over five months using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, electroretinography (ERG), and histopathological analysis. Tumor control was evaluated in an intraocular B16F10 melanoma model using bioluminescence imaging and histopathology. Dose-response studies identified 24 Gy as the optimal dose, producing substantial visual impairment with SR (39.5% reduction in rod a-wave amplitude, p<0.001) without inducing complete blindness. SR induced progressive ocular injury, with significant corneal edema evident by 1 month (p<0.0001), advancing to ulceration by 5 months, whereas FR maintained corneal transparency comparable to non-irradiated controls. Consistent with these findings, TUNEL analysis demonstrated markedly increased corneal apoptosis following SR, whereas FR showed minimal apoptotic activity. ERG analysis revealed profound SR-induced functional deterioration by 5 months, with a 76% reduction in rod a-wave, 69% in rod b-wave, and 74% in cone b-wave amplitudes (all p<0.0001), reflecting extensive photoreceptor and bipolar cell dysfunction. FR eyes retained near-normal responses across retinal layers. Histopathology confirmed severe SR-associated pathology, including corneal perforation, uveal inflammation, and retinal disorganization, whereas FR largely preserved ocular architecture. Importantly, FR maintained short-term antitumor efficacy equivalent to SR, with comparable reductions in tumor burden (both p<0.05 vs. controls; p>0.05 SR vs. FR). FR provides substantial normal tissue protection across multiple ocular compartments while preserving therapeutic efficacy, effectively expanding the therapeutic window for ocular radiotherapy. These findings establish proof-of-principle for clinical translation of FR to improve visual outcomes in patients with ocular and orbital malignancies without compromising tumor control.