Global Efficacy of Aficamten in Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results From ACACIA-HCM.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42663111.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.082026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) is associated with significant morbidity with no approved treatment. Aficamten is a cardiac myosin inhibitor targeting excess contractility and diastolic impairment, the predominant mechanism responsible for adverse outcomes in nHCM. In the ACACIA-HCM trial (Assessment Comparing Aficamten to Placebo on Cardiac Endpoints in Adults With Non-Obstructive HCM; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06081894), aficamten significantly improved outcomes in patients with nHCM versus placebo. To contextualize the observed treatment effects, we performed a responder analysis integrating multiple clinically relevant measures. Patients with symptomatic nHCM were randomized to daily aficamten (n=258) or placebo (n=259) assessed at week 36, including (1) symptom burden (≥1 improvement in New York Heart Association class or reported improvement in Patient Global Impression of Change); (2) exercise capacity (≥0.5 mL/kg per min in peak oxygen uptake); (3) >10% decrease in left atrial volume index; (4) >10% improvement in septal early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e'); (5) ≥50% reduction in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Overall clinical response was classified by the number of favorable outcomes achieved: nonresponder (none), limited (1 or 2), partial (3 or 4), or complete (all 5). At 36 weeks, a greater proportion of patients treated with aficamten versus placebo experienced improvements in symptom burden (71% versus 53%), peak exercise capacity (45% versus 37%), left atrial volume index (31% versus 23%), septal e' (51% versus 26%), and NT-proBNP (63% versus 5%) (<i>P</i><0.05 for all except peak oxygen uptake, <i>P</i>=0.1). Number needed to treat for aficamten ranged from 1.7 (NT-proBNP reduction) to 14 (peak oxygen uptake improvement) relative to placebo. A partial or complete clinical response (≥3 outcomes) was achieved in 53% of patients on aficamten versus 14% on placebo (<i>P</i><0.001). In patients with nHCM, aficamten was associated with improvements across a broad range of clinically relevant measures including symptom burden and diastolic function. These results underscore a potential benefit of aficamten in the population of patients with nHCM. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06081894.