Learnable-order fractional recurrent networks: Structured identification of memory in non-stationary sequences.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42664792.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.neunet.2026.109537.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Non-stationary sequences may exhibit changing effective memory. We study the Learnable-Order Fractional Recurrent Network (LOFT-RNN), a recurrent block in which the order α<sub>t</sub> ∈ (0, 1) of a type-I Caputo derivative is generated from the evolving state and input. The hidden trajectory follows <sub>0</sub><sup>C</sup>D<sub>t</sub><sup>α(t)</sup>h(t)=f<sub>θ</sub>(h(t),x(t)), with α(t)=α<sub>min</sub>+(α<sub>max</sub>-α<sub>min</sub>)σ(g<sub>ϕ</sub>(h(t),x(t))). The theoretical scope is deliberately limited. We give (i) a represented-class approximation proposition, conditional on a finite-dimensional fractional-state realization and uniform continuous dependence of its solution map; (ii) a uniform consistency estimate for the exact-weight L<sub>1</sub> formula, together with a separate interpolation-error term for the order grid; (iii) a variable-order bounded-input bounded-state estimate under dissipativity, with a Mittag-Leffler refinement only for constant order; and (iv) a regret result for an auxiliary one-dimensional reset-OGD tracker under convex surrogate losses and explicit detection assumptions. The auxiliary tracker is not identified with end-to-end neural-gate training. We also state the boundary assumptions at t=0, explain the choice of the Caputo derivative, and show that the untruncated history convolution costs O(N<sup>2</sup>d) over a length-N trajectory. The archived aggregate experiments cover a delimited-copy task, regime-switching ARFIMA sequences, Bonn EEG segment classification, and S&P 500 volatility forecasting. Because seed-level outputs, split manifests, executable code, and some requested baselines are absent from the supplied archive, the empirical comparisons are reported descriptively and no statistical-significance or state-of-the-art claim is made.