Understanding Discordant Board Outcomes: Why Top Part I Performers Fail Part II of the ABPMR Certification Examination.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42675592.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PHM.0000000000003151.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
It is unexpected when initial certification examinees pass the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) Part I Examination with a top score and subsequently fail the Part II Examination. This study aims to determine individual and residency program factors associated with this outcome. A retrospective, observational review of ABPMR data between 1999 and 2025 identified 161 individuals (1.6% of all examinees) who passed Part I with top quartile performance but subsequently failed one or more attempt at Part II. Multinomial logistic regression models demonstrated a lower odds ratio for Part II failure among female physicians (OR=0.60, P=0.016) and those enrolled in fellowship training (OR=0.53, P=0.006). A higher odds ratio was found for physicians aged >40 years (OR=3.80, P<0.001), non-white ethnicity (OR=1.80, P=0.004), and those who completed newer (<10 years, OR=3.13, P=0.026) and smaller (2-4 and 5-7 residents per year, OR=1.98 and 2.13, P=0.009 and 0.001) residency programs. Awareness of this potential outcome should prompt rigorous preparation for the Part II Examination, even for the highest performing Part I examinees.