Characterizing neurological complications following anterior-to-the-psoas vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: The role of neuromonitoring, psoas location, and screw placement.

Abstract

To determine whether changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring with saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) stimulation, preoperative assessment of  lumbar plexus location, and screw placement, are associated with thigh paresthesia development following an anterior-to-the-psoas (ATP) approach for vertebral body tethering (VBT) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. 39 patients who underwent a thoracoabdominal ATP approach for VBT with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Neurologic monitoring variables, including saphenous nerve SSEPs and quadriceps motor evoked potentials (MEPs), psoas location, an indicator of lumbar plexus location, and screw placement were compared between patients with and without postoperative thigh paresthesia. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. 41% of patients experienced postoperative thigh paresthesia. Additionally, 10% reported transient thigh numbness. No patients developed motor deficits. Lumbar plexus position and screw distance did not significantly differ between groups, and no neuromonitoring alarms occurred during psoas retraction. Although changes in quadriceps MEPs were not statistically associated with postoperative sensory symptoms, a higher proportion of patients with paresthesia demonstrated MEP changes (50% vs 19%, p = 0.063) and decreased MEP amplitudes (31% vs 13%, p = 0.077), representing a directional difference. All sensory symptoms resolved without intervention at a mean of 5.3 ± 5.6 weeks and a median of 2.5 (IQR 1-10). Changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring with saphenous nerve SSEP stimulation, psoas location, and screw positioning were not statistically associated with postoperative thigh paresthesia following the ATP approach for VBT in AIS patients. However, a directional difference was observed between quadriceps MEP changes and postoperative thigh paresthesia. These findings highlight the complexity of neurologic responses and support further investigation into patient-specific anatomy, surgical technique, and optimization of neuromonitoring strategies.