Testosterone Replacement Therapy is Associated With Increased Risk of Pseudarthrosis After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity Matched Analysis.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42690625.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/21925682261487188.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether preoperative testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) use is associated with increased risks of pseudarthrosis and reoperation following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).MethodsThe TriNetX Research Network was queried to identify adult males aged 18 to 89 years who underwent single-level ACDF. Patients were separated into a TRT exposure group within 1 year before initial ACDF procedure as well as comparator cohort without TRT exposure that was matched 1:1 using propensity score matching based on age, race, and relevant medical comorbidities. Patients were followed longitudinally for 2 years from the index procedure to assess postoperative outcomes. The primary outcomes were pseudarthrosis and reoperation. Risk ratios and time-to-event hazard ratios were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals.ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 494 matched pairs reached balance across all baseline characteristics. Patients receiving TRT demonstrated a 70% increased risk of pseudarthrosis (RR 1.70, CI 1.20-2.39; HR 1.71 CI 1.19 - 2.46) compared to the non-TRT cohort. TRT use was not associated with an increased risk of reoperation (RR 0.92 CI 0.59-1.43; HR 0.87, CI 0.55-1.38) following ACDF.ConclusionsPreoperative testosterone replacement therapy was associated with increased risk of pseudarthrosis, but not reoperation following ACDF. These findings suggest that TRT may represent an important patient-specific risk marker in patients undergoing ACDF. Given the observational design and potential for residual confounding, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of a causal effect.