Designing a user-centered mHealth screening system for children in low-resource settings: A multi-stakeholder implementation study.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42691872.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106705.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To identify user requirements, usability expectations, and contextual constraints relevant to designing and implementing a scalable mobile health (mHealth) hearing-screening system for children in low-resource settings. Cross-sectional, implementation-oriented survey. A total of 1,055 stakeholders: teachers (n = 364), Anganwadi workers (n = 350), and parents/caregivers (n = 341) of children aged 3-10 years. A structured questionnaire assessed seven implementation-relevant domains: digital infrastructure and system readiness; awareness and screening context; operational workflow; usability and interaction readiness; feasibility constraints; acceptability, trust, and workload; and system-design requirements. Group differences were analyzed using chi-square tests and Cramer's V. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with willingness to use the system. Smartphone use was reported by 96.7 % and daily use by 76.5 %, whereas only 19.6 % had access to earphones/headphones. Awareness of childhood hearing loss was high (91.6 %), but 81.0 % had no previous screening-tool experience, indicating an awareness-practice gap. Significant group differences occurred across awareness, workflow, usability, feasibility, and system-design domains. Willingness to use the system was 68.3 %, and 78.9 % expressed trust in AI-assisted outputs when explained. Time constraints (77.4 %) and anticipated increased workload (80.9 %) were prominent barriers. Respondents preferred 6-10-minute screening, 1-3-step workflows, multimodal guidance, and offline functionality. Teachers had higher odds of willingness than Anganwadi workers (OR = 2.10, 95 % CI 1.40-3.10, p < 0.001), and prior screening exposure was independently associated with willingness (OR = 1.90, 95 % CI 1.30-2.80, p = 0.002). Infrastructure variables were not independently associated after adjustment. Implementation readiness extends beyond digital infrastructure. Scalable mHealth hearing-screening systems should prioritize simple, multimodal workflows, offline functionality, role-specific preparation, transparent decision support, and structured referral pathways. These stakeholder-informed requirements provide a basis for subsequent usability and field evaluation.