Association of Resilience with Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Operative Fixation of Pilon Fractures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42715161.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003275.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the association between resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following operative fixation of pilon fractures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Single Level I trauma center. Adult patients (≥18 years) with AO/OTA 43 pilon fractures treated operatively between 2022 and 2026 were included. Patients without postoperative PROs or a 6-month BRS were excluded. Patients were stratified by median 6-month BRS into low (<3.67) and high (≥3.67) resilience groups. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains (global physical health [GPH], global mental health [GMH], physical function [PF], pain interference [PI], depression, anxiety) and percent of normal function at multiple postoperative timepoints (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). Clinical outcomes included reoperation, fracture-related infection, nonunion, and amputation. Outcomes were compared between resilience groups. A total of 105 patients were included (low resilience: n = 48; high resilience: n = 57). Low- and high-resilience groups were similar in age (46.7 [range, 20.0-76.9] vs 51.6 years [range: 18.5-88.7], respectively), BMI (29.6 vs 30.7 kg/m2, respectively), sex (52.1% vs 42.1% male respectively), and race (60.4% vs 73.7% White, respectively), although patients in the low-resilience group demonstrated higher ISS (15.8 vs 9.8, p < 0.001). Compared with the low-resilience group, the high-resilience group demonstrated higher GMH at all timepoints (all p ≤ 0.021), while depression and anxiety scores were lower at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months (all p ≤ 0.019). Compared with the low-resilience group, the high-resilience group also demonstrated higher GPH and PF scores and lower PI scores at 3 and 6 months (all p ≤ 0.045), as well as higher percent of normal function at 6 months (51.7% vs 40.5%, p = 0.040). Higher resilience was associated with improved PROs following operative fixation of pilon fractures, with differences observed early and persisting over time. Resilience represents an important patient-specific factor associated with recovery and may provide additional context when interpreting postoperative outcomes. III.