Coracoid process morphometry in Asians: a systematic review of computed tomography-based studies.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42723387.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5397/cise.2026.00549.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Accurately measuring the coracoid process is essential to coracoid transfer procedures. This systematic review synthesizes computed tomography (CT)-based studies of coracoid morphometry in Asians, summarises measurement parameters, and establishes pooled-mean dimensional estimates. CT-based studies reporting coracoid morphometry in Asians were identified. Pooled estimates were calculated from study-level sample sizes, means, and standard deviations using a combined-group variance approach. Study quality was assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assurance checklist. Fourteen studies comprising 1,581 coracoid processes were included. The pooled mean age was 46.38±14.62 years (9 studies). The pooled mean measurements were: total coracoid length 39.82±3.17 mm (5 studies); tip to flexion point distance 23.31±3.50 mm (3 studies); tip to coracoclavicular ligament distance 22.66±2.99 mm (2 studies); thickness halfway between the tip and base 11.28±1.39 mm (3 studies); and thickness 1 cm from the tip 10.03±0.95 mm (3 studies). In females, the pooled mean measurements were total length 38.79±3.95 mm (5 studies); tip to flexion point distance 19.98±1.91 mm (2 studies); thickness halfway between the tip and base 10.58±1.08 mm (3 studies); and thickness 1 cm from the tip 9.52±0.83 mm (2 studies). Although heterogeneity in anatomical definitions limits cross-study comparability, pooled coracoid dimensions in Asian females suggest that they approach previously proposed fracture-risk thresholds. Well-designed studies using standardised morphometric definitions and measurement protocols are needed to further evaluate this finding.