Short-term versus long-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PACT-21 CASSANDRA): results from the second randomisation analysis of a randomised, open-label, 2 × 2 factorial phase 3 trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42733563.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104190 and PMC identifier 13571558.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The first randomisation results from the PACT-21/CASSANDRA trial demonstrated that cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine (PAXG) is a standard neoadjuvant treatment option for resectable/borderline resectable (R/BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here, we report the results of the second randomisation comparing long versus short pre-operative chemotherapy. PACT-21/CASSANDRA was a 2 × 2 factorial phase 3 trial involving 17 academic hospitals across 10 regions in Italy. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with pathologically confirmed R/BR PDAC and were first randomly assigned to either PAXG or fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX). Patients without progression or limiting toxicity after 4 months were randomised to receive 2 further months of the same chemotherapy either before (long) or after (short) surgery. The trial was designed under a two-sided superiority hypothesis (H0: HR long versus short = 1.0; H1: HR ≠ 1.0). Randomisation lists were stratified according to previous chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints were radiological, CA19.9 and complete pathological response, R0 and N0 resections, chemotherapy dose-density, and overall survival (OS). Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04793932) and EudraCT (2020-003080-26 and 2024-519031-42-00). Between Feb 23, 2021, and Sept 03, 2024, 86 patients were assigned to long and 79 to short preoperative chemotherapy. No difference in EFS was observed between the two groups in the intention-to-treat population (unadjusted HR 0.98; 95% CI; 0.68-1.41; <i>P</i> = 0.90). CA19-9 response (58 [97%] of 60 versus 41 [84%] of 49 patients; <i>P =</i> 0.02), pathological complete response (4 [5%] of 86 versus 0 of 79 patients; <i>P</i> = 0.05), N0 resection rate (39 [45%] of 86 versus 21 [27%] of 79 patients; <i>P =</i> 0.01), and chemotherapy dose-density were improved by longer chemotherapy. OS data are not yet mature. Long and short preoperative chemotherapy obtains similar EFS in R/BR PDAC. Future research should focus on more effective treatment regimens and explore the optimal post-operative therapy. MyEverest and Codice Viola (patients' associations).