The Effects of Intermittent Hypoxic Training Strategies on Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Humans: A Meta-analysis with Meta-regression.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42742930.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s40279-026-02482-9.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Intermittent hypoxic training aims to enhance exercise performance and health, commonly assessed through maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max). Currently applied methods are live-high train-low (LHTL), live-low train-high (LLTH) and passive hypoxic conditioning (PHC). However, within these methods, numerous modes of application exist, and effectiveness is debated. To determine the effect of LHTL, LLTH and PHC on VO<sub>2</sub>max in healthy participants, and identify factors associated with the amplitude of change in VO<sub>2</sub>max. We conducted a systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Studies were identified through PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. We included controlled studies, calculating between-group standardised mean differences. Athlete and non-athlete populations were analysed separately. RoB2 was used to assess study quality and publication bias was investigated with funnel plots and the Egger's test. Of the 5244 identified studies, 62 were included for analysis, resulting in a sample size of 1332 participants (610 athletes, 722 non-athletes). LHTL increased VO<sub>2</sub>max significantly more than control in athletes (mean difference [MD] = 2.17; 95% CI = 0.77, 3.56) but not in non-athletes (MD = 3.1; 95% CI = - 0.23, 6.43). LLTH did not increase VO<sub>2</sub>max significantly more than control in athletes (MD = 0.89; 95% CI = - 0.27, 2.05) but it did in non-athletes (MD = 1.70; 95% CI = 0.85, 2.54). PHC did not increase VO<sub>2</sub>max significantly more than control in athletes (MD = - 1.07; 95% CI = - 3.51, 1.37) but it did in non-athletes (MD = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.00, 3.52). Multivariate meta-regressions identified the severity, duration, and frequency of hypoxic exposure to be significantly associated with the change in VO<sub>2</sub>max. LHTL showed a significant effect on VO<sub>2</sub>max in athletic populations while LLTH and PHC showed a significant effect on VO<sub>2</sub>max in non-athletic populations only. Future studies should target investigating which characteristics (e.g. severity, duration) of the hypoxic exposure are most beneficial.