Patient expectations assessed before randomisation and after the first treatment session, and their associations with pain outcome at 3 months in patients with tennis elbow: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled feasibility trial in Norwegian secondary care.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42744356.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-122686.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate patients' expectations of pain improvement before randomisation (T<sub>1</sub>) and after the first treatment (T<sub>2</sub>), and to examine how expectations at these two time points were associated with pain outcome measured at 3 months (T<sub>3</sub>). Exploratory secondary analyses of a three-arm, randomised controlled feasibility trial in patients with tennis elbow comparing heavy slow resistance training, shock wave therapy and advice (1:1:1). Outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital. Adults with lateral epicondylalgia, commonly known as tennis elbow. Expected pain was rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>. Present pain (NRS, 0-10) was reported at 3 months (T<sub>3</sub>). Changes in expectations from T<sub>1</sub> to T<sub>2</sub> were summarised descriptively. Univariable linear regressions assessed associations between T<sub>3</sub> pain and expectations at T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>, treatment group and baseline factors. Explained variance was quantified by R<sup>2</sup>. Multivariable models including demographics and baseline pain were evaluated via adjusted R<sup>2</sup>. Fifty-four participants were included. In the shock wave group, nine (47%) came to expect greater improvement from T<sub>1</sub> to T<sub>2</sub>; by contrast, in the advice group, seven (41%) expected less improvement. Expectations at T<sub>1</sub> were not associated with T<sub>3</sub> pain, whereas expectations at T<sub>2</sub> were positively associated with T<sub>3</sub> pain (b=0.61, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.89, p<0.01, R<sup>2</sup>=0.27), suggesting that higher expected pain at T<sub>2</sub> was associated with higher reported pain at T<sub>3</sub>. Adding education and baseline pain increased explained variance modestly (R<sup>2</sup> from 0.27 to 0.32). In this study, expectations measured after randomisation and one treatment session were associated with pain at 3 months for patients with tennis elbow. Larger, prospectively designed studies should investigate how postrandomisation expectations relate to clinical outcomes in non-blinded musculoskeletal trials. NCT04803825.
Medical subject headings
- Tennis Elbow
- Resistance Training
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy