Etiologic role of unapparent exposure in cat allergy.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7573835.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the importance of unnoticed exposure to cat, we studied 20 patients with a history of respiratory allergy. All the patients had a positive prick test to cat dander extract, and none of them kept cats as pets. The prick test was carried out with a dander extract from cat at a concentration of 100 BU/ml. The specific IgE was determined by the commercially available Pharmacia CAP System. We carried out a conjunctival challenge test. The concentration of Fel d 1 was quantified in dust samples from the patients' homes by a commercially available method. The patients were reassessed in order to establish a relation between exposure and symptoms, and concealed allergen sources. Sixteen patients showed significant levels of Fel d 1 in their homes (mean of 3.35 micrograms/g of dust). The conjunctival challenge test was positive in 15 patients. These patients showed an exposure mean of 0.4 microgram/g of dust. The mean levels of specific serum IgE were higher in those patients with a positive challenge than in those with a negative challenge (P = 0.0145). In nine reassessed patients, a relation was established between natural exposure and the onset of the symptoms. A possible hidden allergen source was established in 11 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Medical subject headings
- Cats
- Environmental Exposure
- Hypersensitivity