The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma.
case_report · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7752325.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Ureteral stents are an integral part of urological practice. However, stents that migrate, fragment or are forgotten pose a management and legal dilemma. Our series consists of 31 patients, 22 with forgotten stents that were left indwelling for more than 6 months (mean 22.7) and 9 migrated stents. Of the forgotten stents 15 (68%) were calcified, 10 (45%) were fragmented, and 3 (14%) were calcified and fragmented. Procedures to render the patient stent-free were ureteroscopy in 16 (52%), percutaneous nephroscopy in 8 (26%), cystoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 6 (19%), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 10 (32%), open cysto-litholapaxy in 1 (3%) and simple nephrectomy in 1 (3%). Multiple procedures were required in 6 patients (19%). Management of such complicated ureteral stents requires a multimodal therapeutic approach incorporating the latest in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourological techniques. These patients are at increased risk for loss of renal function. A computerized tracking registry of ureteral stents may help prevent this urological travesty.
Medical subject headings
- Catheters, Indwelling
- Foreign Bodies
- Iatrogenic Disease
- Stents
- Urinary Catheterization