Comparison of conventional Lewis-Tanner two-stage oesophagectomy with the synchronous two-team approach.

Abstract

Twenty-seven patients with oesophageal carcinoma had subtotal oesophagectomy by the Lewis-Tanner operation (group 1, n = 14) or a synchronous modification (group 2, n = 13). Synchronous operations were completed more quickly (230 versus 305 min, P < 0.01), but with more time spent under single-lung anaesthesia (160 versus 120 min, P < 0.01) and a greater fall in systolic blood pressure during hiatal manipulation (60 versus 30 mmHg, P < 0.01). Operative blood loss was not significantly greater in group 2, but the total volume of blood transfused in the peri-operative period was greater in this group (5 versus 3 units, P < 0.01). Four patients in group 1 suffered significant postoperative complications, compared with seven in group 2; three postoperative deaths occurred in group 2. This study suggests that the synchronous two-team oesophagectomy produces a higher incidence of complications than the conventional operation. Continued use of the Lewis-Tanner two-stage oesophagectomy is recommended for patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus.