The role of suspicion in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7813324.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is largely undiagnosed because clinical suspicion is not raised in most instances, and thus, patients with PE go undetected. In this paper, we try to define the role of clinical assessment (including chest radiography, electrocardiogram, arterial blood gas analysis) in making the diagnosis early, accurate, and at low cost, and propose a flow chart to be used in clinical practice. All patients with otherwise unexplained dyspnea or chest pain should be sent for perfusion lung scintigraphy; accordingly, underdetection of PE and mortality of PE should be reduced. If, within 1 h after the clinical suspicion has been raised, the above-mentioned simple and noninvasive examinations are available, they may be employed to reduce the number of unnecessary procedures, without losing patients actually affected by PE. Finally, when diagnostic tools are not promptly available, noninvasive techniques may be employed to identify patients with the highest probability of PE where to start with heparin coverage while waiting for definitive diagnosis.
Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Embolism