Femorodistal vein grafts: the utility of graft surveillance criteria.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7823351.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This retrospective review of femorodistal vein grafts was analyzed to determine the usefulness of various graft surveillance criteria. The surveillance schedule involved evaluations at 1 month, every 3 months the first year, and then every 6 months. Salvage intervention or graft occlusion occurring within the next follow-up interval defined surveillance end points. One hundred two grafts (329 surveillance visits) had an ankle/brachial index (ABI). A duplex scanning-determined midgraft peak systolic flow velocity (PSFV) was available for 81 grafts (262 visits). Forty-eight grafts (137 visits) had both a PSFV and entire graft duplex scanning (EGDS) to determine stenosis greater than 50%, whereas 40 grafts (91 visits) had simultaneous ABI and EGDS. When a greater than 15% decrease in ABI denoted an abnormal surveillance study result, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 24.3% and negative predictive value of 94.5% were noted. Similarly, a PSFV cutoff of less than 35 cm/sec demonstrated values of 26.3% and 94.2%, respectively. When an EGDS of greater than 50% stenosis or a PSFV of less than 35 cm/sec were the cutoff criteria, the PPV was 36.7% and negative predictive value 99.1%, whereas characterizing abnormal results further with ABI (> 15% decreases) increased the PPV to 83.3%. The combination of an EGDS, midgraft PSFV, and ABI provides optimal follow-up for our patients with a femorodistal vein graft.
Medical subject headings
- Femoral Artery
- Graft Occlusion, Vascular