The reliability and validity of the proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7866686.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the newly proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10. Eighty-six acutely ill men and women were prospectively recruited from the Al Ain psychiatric units, UAE. Both versions of ICD-10, the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines and the Diagnostic Criteria for Research (DCR) were used for coding axis I psychiatric diagnosis and its grade of severity; the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule was used to assess disabilities. Inter-rater reliability of the DAS items ranged from moderate to good, and axis V ratings correctly predicted 84% of the observed classification on axis I. Axis V is a valid measure of disabilities, but is limited by its modest reliability.
Medical subject headings
- Disability Evaluation
- Persons with Disabilities
- Mental Disorders
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales