Comparison of stability of proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy and proximal horizontal "V" osteotomy.

Abstract

Proximal metatarsal osteotomies are often performed in patients with hallux valgus and significant metatarsus primus varus. The crescentic osteotomy is popular; however, some authors have reported malunion of the metatarsal shaft caused by dorsal angulation of the osteotomy in a significant number of cases. Recently, proximal transverse "V" osteotomies have been reported to have good results, with rapid healing and no dorsal malunions. We compared the stability of a transverse, proximal "V" osteotomy, using two 0.062-inch K-wires or a 3.5-mm cortical screw for fixation, with that of the proximal crescentic osteotomy, using a 3.5-mm cortical screw fixation. The three osteotomy/fixation techniques were performed on 30 fresh-frozen cadaver feet. The specimens were loaded to failure at the fixation site by applying a load through the plantar surface of the first metatarsal head. Force versus displacement curves were obtained to calculate the failure load and stiffness. Statistical differences among the three groups were determined by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test and the standard t-test. The "V" osteotomy/screw group was more stable than either the "V" osteotomy/pin group or the crescentic osteotomy/screw group. Differences in failure strength between the "V"/screw group and the other two groups were significant at the P < .01 level and the differences in stiffness were significant at the P = .05 level. No statistical differences were found between the "V"/pins and the crescentic/screw groups.