Bone marrow immunoscintigraphy versus conventional bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of skeletal metastases in urogenital malignancies.

Abstract

Bone marrow immunoscintigraphy using a 99mTc-labelled anti-NCA-95 monoclonal antibody and conventional bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-methylene-diphosphonate were compared in the diagnosis of skeletal metastases in 58 patients with urogenital tumours. In 13 patients with metastatic disease, bone marrow immunoscintigraphy proved to be superior to bone scintigraphy, detecting 431 metastatic lesions on immunoscans as compared to 261 lesions on bone scans. However, on a patient-by-patient basis bone marrow immunoscintigraphy did not demonstrate a clinical advantage over conventional bone scanning, as in this study no patient was identified with metastatic disease still confined to the marrow space, with bone scintigraphy and bone X-ray being normal.