Intravenous versus rectal prochlorperazine in the treatment of benign vascular or tension headache: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7978566.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of i.v. and PR prochlorperazine for treatment of acute benign vascular or tension headache. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. University emergency department with 50,000 annual census. Forty-five adult patients enrolled on 46 visits. Patients received 10 mg prochlorperazine i.v. and placebo suppository or 25 mg prochlorperazine PR and placebo injection. Pain assessment was made using a 10-cm visual-analog scale; scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests (alpha of .01). Mean 60-minute pain scores for i.v. and PR groups were 0.6 and 3.5, respectively (P = .0002). Two patients (8.7%) in the i.v. group and six patients (26.1%) in the PR group required rescue analgesia (P = .12). i.v. prochlorperazine appears to provide more effective relief than PR prochlorperazine for benign vascular or tension headaches.
Medical subject headings
- Prochlorperazine
- Tension-Type Headache
- Vascular Headaches