Facilitation of peripheral intravenous access: an evaluation of two methods to augment venous filling.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 7978569.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate two methods of augmenting venous filling as potential aids to i.v. cannulation. Comparative study of cross-sectional areas of preselected antecubital fossa veins. Vascular laboratory of a British university teaching hospital. Thirty healthy, normotensive, adult volunteers. Vessel cross-sectional areas measured noninvasively using a color flow duplex ultrasound scanner. Measurements were taken at rest, after application of a venous tourniquet, with tourniquet and Esmarch bandage, and with tourniquet and Rhys-Davies exsanguinator. Mean (+/- SD) cross-sectional area at rest was 0.18 +/- 0.094 cm2 and after tourniquet was 0.28 +/- 0.14 cm2. Application of an Esmarch bandage produced an increase to 0.33 +/- 0.14 cm2, and Rhys-Davies exsanguinator produced an increase to 0.32 +/- 0.15 cm2 (P < .0001 for all comparisons except Rhys-Davies exsanguinator versus Esmarch bandage). Application of either the Esmarch bandage or the Rhys-Davies exsanguinator caused significant filling of antecubital fossa veins in excess of that produced by a venous tourniquet alone in normovolemic, normotensive volunteers.
Medical subject headings
- Catheterization, Peripheral
- Elbow
- Tourniquets