Interference fixation versus postfixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A biomechanical comparative study in porcine knees.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8131350.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study compares biomechanical characteristics of interference screw fixation to "postfixation" (sutures tied over cancellous screw and washer) of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts in porcine anatomic specimen knees. Maximum pull-out strength (ultimate failure load), displacement of the bone graft at 110 N of force, and mode of failure were compared in a progressive load to failure test. Interference screw fixation demonstrated statistically significantly (p = 0.04) higher mean ultimate failure loads (535 N) compared to postfixation (309.1 N). Interference fixation also demonstrated statistically significantly (p = 0.0003) less displacement of the bone graft at 110 N of force (0.32 mm vs. 2.21 mm). All failures occurred at the fixation site. The authors conclude that interference fixation is stronger than postfixation and, in the immediate postoperative period, should better protect the graft from loosening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, improving stability and allowing more aggressive rehabilitation.
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament
- Bone Screws
- Patellar Ligament
Anatomy
- knee