The significance of perioperative cultures in open pediatric lower-extremity fractures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8168303.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The value of perioperative cultures in 86 open pediatric lower-extremity fractures was assessed. Thirteen infections were identified, for an incidence of 15%. The predebridement culture was positive in 63% of wounds, and the postdebridement culture was positive in 40%. In the 13 wounds with infection, the infecting pathogen was found among the organisms grown on positive predebridement cultures 29% of the time, and on 60% of post-debridement cultures. Neither culture was of value in predicting the identity of a potential subsequent infecting pathogen. There was no significant difference in the rate of infection for negative cultures versus positive cultures; however, a negative predebridement culture was associated with a 94% chance of avoiding infection, and a negative postdebridement culture correlated with a 79% probability that infection would not occur. A positive culture result was less useful, however, because the infection rate remained low in these instances. Predebridement cultures were highly sensitive (88%) in identifying wounds that developed infection; however, the false positive rate was high, resulting in a specificity of only 43%. Postdebridement cultures, although somewhat more specific (63%), lacked sensitivity (50%). Clearly the routine use of perioperative cultures in open pediatric lower-extremity fractures must be questioned. Further prospective study is needed to confirm the validity and general applicability of the results of this retrospective review.
Medical subject headings
- Bacteria
- Fractures, Open
- Leg Injuries