The case against routine metal removal.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8188840.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Metal removal is one of the most commonly performed operations in pediatric orthopedics. Many of these operations are performed electively in asymptomatic patients. In a retrospective study of 138 patients who had metal removal operations, the indication for surgery was uncomplicated healing in 69%. The overall complication rate was 13%, including incomplete removal in 7% and refracture in 1.4% after metal removal. Operations to remove metal from the proximal femur were associated with the highest complication rates, especially in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In a comparison of the risks associated with metal removal operations and the risks of long-term metal retention, little evidence was found to support a policy of routinely removing asymptomatic implants after the completion of bone healing.
Medical subject headings
- Internal Fixators
- Postoperative Complications
- Prostheses and Implants