Repeat lumbar spine surgery. Factors influencing outcome.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8278831.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Forty-five patients who had residual symptoms after lumbar spine surgery were re-evaluated and underwent additional surgery. After a minimum of 2 years' follow-up, these patients' results were reviewed to determine what variables might predict long-term outcome. Age, number of previous operations, and psychological diagnosis were not statistically significant, but a non-compensable injury, ability to return to work after surgery, a negative history of litigation, and achieving a solid fusion were statistically significant in predicting a good outcome. In this study of 45 patients who had repeat surgery, 82% were improved at an average follow-up of 28.2 months. Intrathecally enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, discography, and computed tomography-discography are required to thoroughly evaluate the previously operated lumbar spine, because a single imaging study showed surgical abnormalities in only 61% of the patients in this study.
Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement
- Lumbar Vertebrae
Anatomy
- lumbar spine