Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures. Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8303453.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Fifty-eight back pain patients and 21 entry-level Postal Service workers without low-back pain were evaluated using a variety of lumbar function measures. Isolated trunk strength and full lifting strength were gauged with isokinetic and isometric methods. Lumbar range-of-motion was computed using toe-touch and goniometers. Conventional clinical techniques such as toe touch and straight leg raise were effective in distinguishing back-injured from normal subjects. Isometric and isokinetic peak force and torque tests failed to show significant differences between low-back pain and job applicant groups. When compared with published norms, our job applicant group was significantly deconditioned. Our data suggest that asymptomatic, deconditioned subjects could be mistaken for back-impaired patients or symptom magnifiers.
Medical subject headings
- Back Injuries
- Lifting
- Low Back Pain
- Lumbar Vertebrae
- Muscle Contraction
- Muscles
- Work Capacity Evaluation
Anatomy
- lumbar spine