Double cardiomyoplasty: acute versus chronic results.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8328873.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We previously found that double cardiomyoplasty using both acutely raised, unconditioned latissimus dorsi muscles increased cardiac output by 9.6% (1,547 +/- 154 versus 1,695 +/- 166 mL/min), stroke volume by 18.2% (12.1 +/- 0.6 versus 14.3 +/- 0.7 mL), peak left ventricular pressure by 18.4% (98 +/- 3 versus 116 +/- 5 mm Hg), and peak right ventricular pressure by 62.5% (24 +/- 2 versus 39 +/- 4 mm Hg) (p < 0.05 for all differences). In this study 10 dogs underwent double cardiomyoplasty: 3 died perioperatively, and 7 underwent 8 weeks of muscle conditioning. After the conditioning period, the muscle flaps did not contract in 2 of the 7 dogs. Hemodynamics were measured in the remaining 5 dogs. Using fatigue-resistant muscle, cardiac output decreased by 3.7% (1,279 +/- 262 versus 1,233 +/- 274 mL/min), stroke volume decreased by 9.0% (9.5 +/- 1.2 versus 8.8 +/- 1.2 mL), and peak left ventricular pressure increased by 10.6% (82.1 +/- 6.5 versus 90.8 +/- 3.2 mm Hg), but not significantly. Peak right ventricular pressure increased significantly by 31.3% (24.3 +/- 2.1 versus 31.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg; p < 0.05). Hemodynamic effects of individual left or right muscle contractions versus bilateral muscle stimulation were not significantly different except for a greater percentage increase in peak right ventricular pressure (right, 24.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg unstimulated versus 28.0 +/- 2.1 stimulated; left, 26.3 +/- 0.9 mm Hg unstimulated versus 30.7 +/- 2.4 mm Hg stimulated; bilateral, 24.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg unstimulated versus 31.9 +/- 3.4 mm Hg stimulated; p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Medical subject headings
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures
- Surgical Flaps