Medical student evaluation of self-selected learning modules.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8375603.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to determine the self-directed learning needs of second-year medical students, the resources they selected to address their learning needs, and the effectiveness of those resources. METHODS: Students in an Introduction to Clinical Medicine course were required to devote 24 hours to the study of self-directed learning activities. Although options were provided, students could create their own study modules. Students evaluated each module used. RESULTS: Major needs identified were history and physical examination skills, diagnosis, emergency procedures, psychosocial issues in medicine, and issues concerning physicians as people. The most selected module types were videotapes (52%), computer-aided instruction, labs, and seminars. Overall ratings (5 = high) indicated four clusters of modules: self-directed learning, 4.3; labs, 4.0; seminars, slide-tapes, and computers, 3.65; and videotapes and books, 3.25. Videotapes, the most frequently used module, received low overall ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed learning allowed students to use a great array of educational opportunities. Students appeared to recognize needs, identify resources, and use those resources to address their learning needs.