Evaluation of a chronic pain programme by referring physicians.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8446433.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90121-5.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A neglected source of treatment outcome evaluation is the opinion of the referring physicians. We report on 179 patients with chronic pain who were admitted to a 6 week inpatient inter-disciplinary pain programme. A retrospective 2 page mail questionnaire accompanied by initial letters of referral was sent to the referring physicians. We hypothesized that the main reason family physicians referred patients was to establish a management plan. The physician response rate was 70%, encompassing 72% of the patients. Intra-observer reliability was tested by a second mailing 3 months later (68% response rate). Test-retest reliability, and correlations between questions were significant and are reported for: reasons for referral, the utility of the discharge summary, coping, and behavioural changes at discharge and at time of the questionnaire. This appears to be the first report of a survey of the evaluation of a pain programme by referring physicians.
Medical subject headings
- Pain Management