A histologic and biochemical comparison of the interface tissues in cementless and cemented hip prostheses.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8448933.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Thirty-four membranes from 20 cementless and 14 cemented prostheses from 33 patients excised during revision arthroplasty were analyzed for foreign-body reactive processes. As a control, identical analyses were performed using adjacent pseudocapsular tissue taken from 12 patients during revision arthroplasty. Histologically, cementless membranes tended to contain more metal debris, and cemented membranes contained more foreign-body giant cells. Collagenase, gelatinase, prostaglandin E2, and interleukin-1 were measured in conditioned media taken from organ cultures of each interface membrane. Both cementless and cemented membranes released significant levels of gelatinase and collagenase, prostaglandin E2, and interleukin-1 into the conditioned media when compared with control tissues. However, the tissue concentrations were not significantly different between cementless and cemented membranes. Although histologic differences between cementless and cemented interface membranes exist, both share a similar capacity to release bioactive products that can induce bone resorption and cause aseptic loosening of the hip prostheses.
Medical subject headings
- Foreign-Body Reaction
- Hip Prosthesis
Anatomy
- femur
- hip