The effect of surgical decompression on neurologic outcome after lumbar fractures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8458130.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
From 1980 until 1989, 69 patients with lumbar fractures resulting in incomplete paraparesis were admitted to the authors' medical center for treatment. Thirty had anterior vertebrectomy, including 18 who had posterior instrumentation and four who had anterior instrumentation. Twenty-two patients were treated with a posterolateral decompression and fusion, including four who also required an anterior decompression. Nineteen of the remaining 21 patients required posterior spine instrumentation and fusion only. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor index score was determined for each patient pre- and postoperatively and used to compare these three treatment groups. Average follow-up period for the patients was 19 months. The improvement in ASIA motor score for all patients treated with decompression averaged 10 and similar improvement was obtained in those who were treated with posterior decompression (10.2 points). The average improvement in those who had vertebrectomy was 9.9 points. For those who had fusion without decompression, average improvement was 4.2 points. Comparing those patients who were surgically decompressed, either anteriorly or posteriorly, with those patients who only underwent fusion, the difference in neurologic improvement was statistically significant. Neurologic outcome after lumbar fractures is improved by surgical decompression. The neurologic outcome results were similar after anterior and posterior decompression.
Medical subject headings
- Lumbar Vertebrae
- Spinal Cord Compression
- Spinal Fractures
Anatomy
- lumbar spine