Effects of hypothermia in hypercapnia and hypercapnic hypoxemia.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8517107.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Anesthetized, paralyzed and mechanically ventilated pigs were hypoventilated to extreme hypercapnia (PaCO2 approximately 20 kPa) at FiO2 0.5, and allotted to a hypothermic group (31.5 +/- 0.1 degrees C, n = 6) or a control group (39.6 +/- 0.2 degrees C, n = 6). Compared with the controls, the hypothermic animals had higher PaO2 (19.2 vs 15.6 kPa, P < 0.05), SaO2 (97.2 vs 89.3%), SvO2 (78.7 vs 68.2%), end-tidal O2 (34.5 vs 24.8 kPa) and arterial pH (7.01 vs 6.91), (P < 0.01), but lower PvO2 (7.0 vs 10.2 kPa) and PaCO2 (13.2 vs 23.5 kPa), (P < 0.01). Hypothermia reduced O2 delivery (DO2), O2 consumption (VO2) and CO2 production by 40-45% (P < 0.05), but O2 extraction ratio, i.e. VO2.DO(2)-1 x 100(%), did not differ between groups. Hypothermic animals had lower heart rate (127 vs 223 beats.min-1, P < 0.05) and cardiac output (2.5 vs 3.9 l.min-1, P < 0.01). Subsequently, the inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) was decreased stepwise (0.3, 0.25, 0.21, 0.15, 0.10) at 30-min intervals. At FiO2 0.3, the hypothermic group had higher PaO2 (10.0 vs 5.7 kPa), SaO2 (91.3 vs 28.5%), PvO2 (5.8 vs 3.4 kPa), SvO2 (70.7 vs 10.3%), end-tidal O2 (16.7 vs 8.5 kPa), O2 delivery (344 vs 155 ml.min-1), arterial pH (7.02 vs 6.94) and systemic vascular resistance (3850 vs 1652 dyn.s.cm-5 (38,500 vs 16,520 microN.s.cm-5)) compared with the controls (P < 0.01), while PaCO2 was lower (12.4 vs 22.7 kPa), as well as O2 extraction ratio (23 vs 63%) and O2 half saturation tension (4.3 vs 8.0 kPa) (P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Medical subject headings
- Hypercapnia
- Hypothermia, Induced
- Hypoxia