Management of labour in an isolated rural maternity hospital.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8563590.
- Also identified by PMC identifier 2350026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the use of a maternity unit run by general practitioners and midwives, describing the outcome of labour in an unselected group of women and quantifying the contribution made by general practitioners. Retrospective population based review of obstetric patients who had access to an isolated rural maternity unit. Rural area 120 km from a consultant maternity unit. 997 consecutive women delivered between January 1987 and May 1991. Mode of delivery and complications by place of booking and place of delivery; need for medical intervention and transfer. 530 women (53%) were booked for delivery in the rural unit; this group had a caesarean section rate of 3.8% and an unplanned transfer rate of 12.8% to the consultant unit in labour. Of the 462 who delivered in the low risk unit, 25 (5%) required a forceps delivery; postnatal complications requiring emergency medical support occurred in a further 33 (7%). Risk characterisation is possible, but medical support from general practitioners and obstetricians is required in almost a third of women at low risk for complications of delivery. Results of this study support the team approach to obstetric management but not the move towards isolated units without organised medical support.
Medical subject headings
- Labor, Obstetric
- Maternal Health Services
- Rural Health Services