Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8627837.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We compared our experience with self-contained inflatable and multicomponent prostheses during similar intervals. We followed 295 patients with self-contained prostheses and 1,026 with multicomponent inflatable devices for up to 8 years. Revision rates for mechanical failure, infection or patient dissatisfaction were statistically analyzed. Multicomponent inflatable prostheses were superior with regard to mechanical reliability and patient satisfaction, with no differences in rate of infection. Self-contained prostheses were best replaced with the AMS 700CX device, thus avoiding aneurysm. Self-contained inflatable prostheses may be of limited value for the treatment of impotence. The AMS 700CX is the device of choice for replacement of explanted self-contained prostheses.
Medical subject headings
- Penile Prosthesis