Normal mammograms and the practice of obtaining previous mammograms: usefulness and costs.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8628851.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine the usefulness and cost of acquiring and comparing mammograms previously obtained at a different facility with normal mammograms. Comparison mammographic reports obtained within 52 months in 1,297 consecutive women (aged 33-82 years; mean age, 53 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Mammograms in which a normal interpretation was altered after comparison were reviewed. The clinical importance and the cost of obtaining previous mammograms were determined. Initially, interpretation was normal in 756 (58%) comparison mammograms and abnormal in 541 (42%). Of the 756 normal mammograms, 197 (26%) were not compared with previous mammograms. Of the remaining 559, 551 (98%) had no change. In eight of the 559 (1%), the original interpretation was altered. Seven of these eight mammograms were available for review: In one, a developing density was detected; in three, differences were attributable to technique; and in three, radiologists had different interpretations. No malignancies were detected. The average labor and postage cost was $21.49. Considering the cost and low diagnostic yield, obtaining previous mammograms is of limited usefulness.
Medical subject headings
- Mammography