Biological treatment of NSCLC. The need for conclusive studies.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8635389.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite extensive investigation, biological treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain largely undeveloped. The lack of satisfactory models has frequently led to inadequate phase II studies and to small and inconclusive phase III trials. Nonuniformity of trials has prevented clearer conclusions from being reached by meta-analysis. In general, immunotherapy has failed to fulfill expectations for clinical usefulness. The benefit with this approach, if any, seems to be marginal, but it is not clear whether this is a result of lack of activity or faulty clinical testing. The future of biological agents in cancer treatment lies in ongoing advances in molecular biology, for example in making tumors more immunogenic. Another avenue of further clinical research includes novel forms of therapy with monoclonal antibodies. Adequate models for testing and appropriate clinical trial settings could clarify the role of biological agents in NSCLC.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Immunotherapy
- Lung Neoplasms