Should HIV status alter indications for hemorrhoidectomy?

Abstract

There is a widespread belief that performing hemorrhoidectomy on a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an invitation for disaster. Aim of this study was to compare morbidity of hemorrhoidectomy in HIV-positive (HIV+) with HIV-negative (HIV-) patients. Charts of 27 HIV+ and 30 HIV- male patients less than age 50 years who underwent hemorrhoidectomy were reviewed. Mean age of the 57 study group patients was 38 years. Open hemorrhoidectomy was performed in 26 patients (46 percent), and a closed technique was used in 31 patients (54 percent). HIV+ and HIV- patient groups were well matched to all preoperative and intraoperative variables. Mean T-cell helper count in the HIV+ patient group was 301 (range, 9-1,040) cells/microliter. There were no deaths, and complications were seen in 15 patients (26 percent). There was no difference in overall complication rates between HIV+ and HIV- patient groups. Urinary retention was seen in ten patients (18 percent), three of whom were HIV+ (11 percent) vs. seven of whom were HIV- (23 percent) (P = not significant). Although no patient required reoperation for bleeding, postoperative hemorrhage was seen in three patients (1 HIV+, 2 HIV-). None of the patients developed fecal incontinence. Mean time to complete wound healing was 6.8 (range, 4-12) weeks for HIV+ patients vs. 6.6 (range, 4-14) weeks for HIV- patients (P = not significant). These data suggest that HIV status of a patient should not alter indications for surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease.